Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 26
Filtrar
1.
Int J Cancer ; 146(3): 769-780, 2020 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30977119

RESUMO

Accurate, consistent and reproducible grading by pathologists is of key-importance for identification of individual patients with invasive breast cancer (IBC) that will or will not benefit from adjuvant systemic treatment. We studied the laboratory-specific grading variation using nationwide real-life data to create insight and awareness in grading variation. Synoptic pathology reports of all IBC resection-specimens, obtained between 2013 and 2016, were retrieved from the nationwide Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA). Absolute differences in laboratory-proportions of Grades I-III were compared to the national reference. Multivariable logistic regression provided laboratory-specific odds ratios (ORs) for high- vs. low-grade IBC. 33,792 IBC pathology reports of 33,043 patients from 39 laboratories were included, of which 28.1% were reported as Grade I (range between laboratories 16.3-43.3%), 47.6% as Grade II (38.4-57.8%), and 24.3% as Grade III (15.5-34.3%). Based on national guidelines, the indication for adjuvant chemotherapy was dependent on histologic grade in 29.9% of patients. After case-mix correction, 20 laboratories (51.3%) showed a significantly deviant OR. Significant grading differences were also observed among pathologists within laboratories. In this cohort of 33,043 breast cancer patients, we observed substantial inter- and intra-laboratory variation in histologic grading. It can be anticipated that this has influenced outcome including exposure to unnecessary toxicity, since choice of adjuvant chemotherapy was dependent on grade in nearly a third of patients. Better standardization and training seems warranted.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Mama/patologia , Laboratórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Patologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Seleção de Pacientes , Idoso , Mama/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Laboratórios/normas , Mastectomia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Países Baixos , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Patologistas/normas , Patologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Patologia/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Aesthet Surg J ; 40(2): 156-164, 2020 01 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31242279

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Breast implant-related health problems are a subject of fierce debate. Reliable population-based estimates of implant prevalence rates are not available, however, due to a lack of historical registries and incomplete sales data, precluding absolute risk assessments. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe the methodology of a novel procedure to determine Dutch breast implant prevalence based on the evaluation of routine chest radiographs. METHODS: The validity of the new method was first examined in a separate study. Eight reviewers examined a series of 180 chest radiographs with (n = 60) or without (n = 120) a breast implant confirmed by a computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scan. After a consensus meeting with best-performing expert reviewers, we reviewed 3000 chest radiographs of women aged 20 to 70 years in 2 large regional hospitals in the Netherlands in 2015. To calculate the national breast implant prevalence, regional prevalence variations were corrected utilizing the National Breast Cancer Screening Program. RESULTS: Eight reviewers scored with a median sensitivity of 71.7% (range, 41.7%-85.0%) and a median specificity of 94.6% (range, 73.4%-97.5%). After a consensus meeting and a reevaluation by best-performing expert reviewers, sensitivity was 79.9% and specificity was 99.2%. The estimated national prevalence of breast implants among women between 20 and 70 years was 3.0%, ranging from 1.7% at 21 to 30 years to 3.9% between 51 and 60 years. CONCLUSIONS: The novel method in this study was validated with a high sensitivity and specificity, resulting in accurate prevalence estimates and providing the opportunity to conduct absolute risk assessment studies on the health consequences of breast implants.


Assuntos
Implantes de Mama/estatística & dados numéricos , Mamografia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adulto Jovem
3.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 34(12): 1171-1174, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31728879

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Autopsy rates have been declining worldwide. The present study reports the outcome of a retrospective analysis of all non-forensic autopsies in the Netherlands over a course of 25 years, and compares these with the most recent Dutch study. METHOD: Retrospectively, 25 years of data on clinical autopsies from the Nationwide Network and Registry of Histo- and Cytopathology in the Netherlands (PALGA) was paired with the mortality registry (Statistics Netherlands). RESULTS: The crude prevalence of autopsies declined from 7.07% in 1991 to 2.73% in 2015. After adjusting for age at death, there was no difference in autopsy rate between males and females. An increasing age significantly decreased the autopsy rate. CONCLUSION: In the Netherlands, clinical autopsies have been declining over the last quarter century. Age at death, but not sex, was associated with the autopsy rate. These different results stress the importance of correct collection and analysis methods of data.


Assuntos
Autopsia/tendências , Medicina Legal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Autopsia/estatística & dados numéricos , Causas de Morte , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Medicina Legal/tendências , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
4.
JCO Clin Cancer Inform ; 3: 1-12, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31070983

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The use of standardized structured reporting (SSR) can improve communication between cancer specialists, which might improve clinical care; however, there are no reliable data on whether the introduction of SSR is associated with improvements in clinical outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study in the Netherlands, including all patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) from 2009 to 2014. As a reference, cohorts of 2007 and 2008 were included. Data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry were used and combined with data from the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA) and the Dutch ColoRectal Audit. We tested the preformulated hypothesis that use of SSR improves the care of patients with CRC by improving the completeness of the pathology reports, the quality of the pathology evaluation, and patient outcomes with respect to treatment and survival. RESULTS: We included 72,859 patients with CRC (23.8% reference, 32.9% SSR, and 43.3% narrative reports). Use of SSR increased over time, which resulted in more complete pathology reports (95.8% v 89.8%; P < .001). Risk assessment in stage II colon cancer was more adequate and resulted in an increased delivery of adjuvant therapy in patients with SSR (19.6% v 15.1%; P = .001). Risk of death for patients in the SSR group was significantly lowered (corrected hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI 0.90 to 0.97). CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that use of SSR improved patient care in those with CRC by providing more complete reports of higher quality, which had significant effects on the delivery of adjuvant therapy and patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Atenção à Saúde , Assistência ao Paciente , Melhoria de Qualidade , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Gerenciamento Clínico , Comunicação em Saúde , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Sistema de Registros , Relatório de Pesquisa
5.
Histopathology ; 74(6): 925-932, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30725483

RESUMO

AIMS: Variation in health-care is undesirable, as this is potentially harmful for patients. In the Netherlands, an e-learning module was developed to standardise pathological evaluation of colorectal adenomas. We studied the effect of e-learning on interlaboratory variability in grading of dysplasia in screened conventional colorectal adenomas. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cross-sectional retrospective study was performed, including all colorectal adenomas from the Dutch population-based colorectal cancer screening programme, retrieved from the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA) from January 2014 to July 2015. The e-learning tool, commissioned by the National Institute for Public Health, was implemented among screening pathologists from October 2014. Proportions of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) were compared before (January-July 2014) and after implementation (October 2014-July 2015) of the e-learning module. Interlaboratory variation was assessed by multilevel mixed-effects analysis. In total, 20 713 colonoscopies (20 546 patients) were performed after a positive faecal immunochemical screening test, resulting in the inclusion of 56 355 conventional adenomas from 37 pathology laboratories. Before implementation, 12 614 adenomas were diagnosed, including 4.3% with HGD. After implementation, 43 741 adenomas were diagnosed, and the HGD proportion decreased to 3.9%. Univariable analysis showed less deviant proportions of HGD after implementation in 62% of the laboratories (P = 0.019). Multilevel analysis confirmed decreased variation in the risk of diagnosing HGD (P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Interlaboratory variability in grading HGD in colorectal adenomas after a positive screening test decreased after implementation of an e-learning module for pathologists. We therefore conclude that e-learning has a favourable influence on decreasing diagnostic variability, making this a relevant strategy for health-care standardisation.


Assuntos
Adenoma/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Instrução por Computador/métodos , Educação Médica Continuada/métodos , Gradação de Tumores/métodos , Patologia Clínica/educação , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 174(2): 479-488, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30539380

RESUMO

PURPOSE: A considerable part of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions may never progress into invasive breast cancer. However, standard treatment consists of surgical excision. Trials aim to identify a subgroup of low-risk DCIS patients that can safely forgo surgical treatment based on histologic grade, which highlights the importance of accurate grading. Using real-life nationwide data, we aimed to create insight and awareness in grading variation of DCIS in daily clinical practice. METHODS: All synoptic pathology reports of pure DCIS resection specimens between 2013 and 2016 were retrieved from PALGA, the nationwide Dutch Pathology Registry. Absolute differences in proportions of grade I-III were visualized using funnel plots. Multivariable analysis was performed by logistic regression to correct for case-mix, providing odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for high-grade (III) versus low-grade (I-II) DCIS. RESULTS: 4952 DCIS reports from 36 laboratories were included, of which 12.5% were reported as grade I (range 6.1-24.4%), 39.5% as grade II (18.2-57.6%), and 48.0% as grade III (30.2-72.7%). After correction for case-mix, 14 laboratories (38.9%) reported a significantly lower (n = 4) or higher (n = 10) proportion of high-grade DCIS than the reference laboratory. Adjusted ORs (95%CI) ranged from 0.52 (0.31-0.87) to 3.83 (1.42-10.39). Significant grading differences were also observed among pathologists within laboratories. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of 4901 patients, we observed substantial inter- and intra-laboratory variation in DCIS grading, not explained by differences in case-mix. Therefore, there is an urgent need for nationwide standardization of grading practices, especially since the future management of DCIS may alter significantly depending on histologic grade.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/patologia , Laboratórios/normas , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Países Baixos , Razão de Chances , Sistema de Registros
7.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 1622018 12 05.
Artigo em Holandês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30570921

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to determine at a national level whether patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are adequately tested for EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangement, because targeted therapy is tailored to the results of molecular diagnostics. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHOD: Data from all patients with metastatic non-squamous NSCLC diagnosed in 2013 or 2015 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry, and coupled with data from the Netherlands national pathology registry (PALGA). Using information extracted from PALGA we determined what percentage of the tumours were tested for EGFR or KRAS mutations and ALK rearrangement, identified the variables that were associated with the performance of molecular diagnostics and investigated the differences between 48 laboratories. RESULTS: A total of 6,619 patients were included (2013: n = 3,195; 2015: n = 3,424). In 2013, EGFR or KRAS testing was performed on 73.1% of the tumours (variation between laboratories 30.6-91.7%); in 2015 this was 78.9% (variation 40.0-91.0%). In 2013 49.5% of the tumours without EGFR or KRAS mutations underwent ALK testing (variation between laboratories 6.3-100%) and in 2015 ALK testing was performed on 77.4% (32.5-100%). In 2015, 6 and 7 laboratories tested significantly fewer EGFR and ALK tests, respectively, than the national average. CONCLUSION: In 2013, molecular testing for EGFR and KRAS mutations and, in particular, for ALK rearrangement was suboptimal. EGFR and ALK testing was performed significantly more often in 2015. Despite this increase, there is room for improvement in a number of laboratories and hospitals, considering that some patients were possibly wrongly not eligible for targeted therapy.


Assuntos
Quinase do Linfoma Anaplásico/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Testes Genéticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras)/genética , Idoso , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/secundário , Receptores ErbB/genética , Feminino , Rearranjo Gênico , Testes Genéticos/tendências , Mau Uso de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/estatística & dados numéricos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/tendências , Mutação , Países Baixos , Estudos Retrospectivos
8.
JAMA Oncol ; 4(3): 335-341, 2018 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29302687

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Breast implants are among the most commonly used medical devices. Since 2008, the number of women with breast implants diagnosed with anaplastic large-cell lymphoma in the breast (breast-ALCL) has increased, and several reports have suggested an association between breast implants and risk of breast-ALCL. However, relative and absolute risks of breast-ALCL in women with implants are still unknown, precluding evidence-based counseling about implants. OBJECTIVE: To determine relative and absolute risks of breast-ALCL in women with breast implants. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Through the population-based nationwide Dutch pathology registry we identified all patients diagnosed with primary non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the breast between 1990 and 2016 and retrieved clinical data, including breast implant status, from the treating physicians. We estimated the odds ratio (OR) of ALCL associated with breast implants in a case-control design, comparing implant prevalence between women with breast-ALCL and women with other types of breast lymphoma. Cumulative risk of breast-ALCL was derived from the age-specific prevalence of breast implants in Dutch women, estimated from an examination of 3000 chest x-rays and time trends from implant sales. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Relative and absolute risks of breast-ALCL in women with breast implants. RESULTS: Among 43 patients with breast-ALCL (median age, 59 years), 32 had ipsilateral breast implants, compared with 1 among 146 women with other primary breast lymphomas (OR, 421.8; 95% CI, 52.6-3385.2). Implants among breast-ALCL cases were more often macrotextured (23 macrotextured of 28 total implants of known type, 82%) than expected (49 193 sold macrotextured implants of total sold 109 449 between 2010 and 2015, 45%) based on sales data (P < .001). The estimated prevalence of breast implants in women aged 20 to 70 years was 3.3%. Cumulative risks of breast-ALCL in women with implants were 29 per million at 50 years and 82 per million at 70 years. The number of women with implants needed to cause 1 breast-ALCL case before age 75 years was 6920. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Breast implants are associated with increased risk of breast-ALCL, but the absolute risk remains small. Our results emphasize the need for increased awareness among the public, medical professionals, and regulatory bodies, promotion of alternative cosmetic procedures, and alertness to signs and symptoms of breast-ALCL in women with implants.


Assuntos
Implantes de Mama/efeitos adversos , Implantes de Mama/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/etiologia , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/epidemiologia , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Implante Mamário/efeitos adversos , Implante Mamário/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Suscetibilidade a Doenças/epidemiologia , Suscetibilidade a Doenças/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Risco , Fatores de Risco
9.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 275(1): 181-189, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29080963

RESUMO

Hypopharynx cancer has the worst prognosis of all head and neck squamous cell cancers. Since the 1990s, a treatment shift has appeared from a total laryngectomy towards organ preservation therapies. Large randomized trials evaluating treatment strategies for hypopharynx cancer, however, remain scarce, and frequently this malignancy is evaluated together with larynx cancer. Therefore, our aim was to determine trends in incidence, treatment and survival of hypopharynx cancer. We performed a population-based cohort study including all patients diagnosed with T1-T4 hypopharynx cancer between 1991 and 2010 in the Netherlands. Patients were recorded by the national cancer registry database and verified by a national pathology database. 2999 patients were identified. The incidence increased significantly with 4.1% per year until 1997 and decreased non-significantly afterwards. For women, the incidence increased with 1.7% per year during the entire study period. Total laryngectomy as primary treatment significantly decreased, whereas radiotherapy and chemoradiation increased. The 5-year overall survival significantly increased from 28% in 1991-2000 to 34% in 2001-2010. Overall survival for T3 was equal for total laryngectomy and (chemo)radiotherapy, but for T4-patients the survival was significantly better after primary total laryngectomy (± adjuvant radiotherapy). This large population-based study demonstrates a shift in treatment preference towards organ preservation therapies. The 5-year overall survival increased significantly in the second decade. The assumed equivalence of organ preservation and laryngectomy may require reconsideration for T4 disease.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Hipofaríngeas/epidemiologia , Idoso , Quimiorradioterapia/tendências , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hipofaríngeas/patologia , Neoplasias Hipofaríngeas/terapia , Incidência , Laringectomia/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Radioterapia Adjuvante/tendências , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Distribuição por Sexo
10.
Aesthet Surg J ; 37(8): NP83-NP87, 2017 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29036941

RESUMO

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare but serious complication in patients with breast implants, Patients are at risk of BIA-ALCL whether they receive breast implants for cosmetic reasons or for reconstructive purposes after surgery for breast cancer or prophylactic mastectomy. During the past decade, an increased number of reports have addressed BIA-ALCL. Herein, we describe BIA-ALCL in a transgender woman. The patient received breast implants as part of her gender transition and was diagnosed with BIA-ALCL 20 years later. The patient underwent several revisional operations in the 20 years after her primary breast surgery to treat unexplained pain with low-grade fever, severe capsular contracture (Baker grade III-IV), and several instances of implant rupture. In July 2016, the patient presented to our office with "late-onset" periprosthetic seroma 5 years after her last revisional breast surgery. She was diagnosed with BIA-ALCL without capsular invasion based on results of cytologic analysis of the periprosthetic seroma and histologic evaluation of the periprosthetic capsule. This diagnosis was verified further by results of immunohistochemical testing, which indicated expression of CD30 and T-cell markers in the periprosthetic seroma only. Our intentions with this case report are to demonstrate that all patients who undergo breast implantation, including transgender women, are at risk of BIA-ALCL and to highlight the importance of cytomorphologic and immunohistochemical screening of seroma fluid in patients with late-onset periprosthetic seroma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.


Assuntos
Implante Mamário/efeitos adversos , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Falha de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Seroma/etiologia , Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Mama/patologia , Mama/cirurgia , Implantes de Mama , Feminino , Humanos , Antígeno Ki-1/metabolismo , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/patologia , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Seroma/diagnóstico por imagem , Seroma/patologia , Seroma/cirurgia , Géis de Silicone/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Pessoas Transgênero , Ultrassonografia
11.
Inflamm Bowel Dis ; 23(11): 2018-2026, 2017 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28837522

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk to develop malignant melanoma and this risk may increase with use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy. Impaired survival of immunosuppressed melanoma patients is reported in transplant and rheumatology patients. This study aims to (1) identify risk factors for melanoma development in patients with IBD, (2) compare clinical characteristics of melanoma in patients with IBD to the general population, and (3) assess the influence of immunosuppressive medication on survival. METHODS: We retrospectively searched the Dutch Pathology Database to identify all Dutch patients with IBD with cutaneous melanoma between January 1991 and December 2011. We then performed 2 case-control studies. To identify risk factors for melanoma development in IBD, we compared patients with IBD with melanoma to the general IBD population. To compare outcome and survival after melanoma diagnosis, we compared cases with non-IBD melanoma patients. RESULTS: We included 304 patients with IBD with melanoma, 1800 IBD controls, and 8177 melanoma controls. IBD cases had more extensive IBD (ulcerative colitis: pancolitis: cases 44.5% versus IBD controls without melanoma 28.1%; P < 0.01; Crohn's disease: ileal and colonic disease: cases 57.9% versus controls 48.9%; P = 0.02). Despite a lower Nodes (N)-stage in patients with IBD (N1+ 8.3% versus 18.2%; P < 0.01) with comparable Tumor (T) and Metastasis (M) stages, survival was similar between groups, regardless of immunosuppressive or anti-TNF therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that IBD extent is a risk factor for melanoma development. Despite the lower N-stage in patients with IBD, we could not confirm impaired survival after melanoma in patients with IBD, regardless of anti-TNF and/or thiopurine use.


Assuntos
Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Melanoma/complicações , Neoplasias Cutâneas/complicações , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Melanoma Maligno Cutâneo
12.
BMJ ; 356: j504, 2017 Feb 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28196844

RESUMO

Objective To compare the cumulative incidence of cervical cancer diagnosed within 72 months after a normal screening sample between conventional cytology and liquid based cytology tests SurePath and ThinPrep.Design Retrospective population based cohort study.Setting Nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands (PALGA), January 2000 to March 2013.Population Women with 5 924 474 normal screening samples (23 833 123 person years).Exposure Use of SurePath or ThinPrep versus conventional cytology as screening test.Main outcome measure 72 month cumulative incidence of invasive cervical cancer after a normal screening sample for each screening test. Cox regression analyses assessed the hazard ratios, adjusted for calendar time, age, screening history, and socioeconomic status and including laboratories as random effects.Results The 72 month cumulative cancer incidence was 58.5 (95% confidence interval 54.6 to 62.7) per 100 000 normal conventional cytology samples, compared with 66.8 (56.7 to 78.7) for ThinPrep and 44.6 (37.8 to 52.6) for SurePath. Compared with conventional cytology, the hazard of invasive cancer was 19% lower (hazard ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 0.99) for SurePath, mainly caused by a 27% lower hazard (0.73, 0.57 to 0.93) of a clinically detected cancer. For ThinPrep, the hazard was on average 15% higher (hazard ratio 1.15, 0.95 to 1.38), mainly caused by a 56% higher hazard of a screen detected cancer (1.56, 1.17 to 2.08).Conclusions These findings should provoke reconsideration of the assumed similarity in sensitivity to detect progressive cervical intraepithelial neoplasia between different types of liquid based cytology and conventional cytology.


Assuntos
Citodiagnóstico , Displasia do Colo do Útero , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Esfregaço Vaginal , Citodiagnóstico/métodos , Citodiagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Esfregaço Vaginal/métodos , Esfregaço Vaginal/estatística & dados numéricos , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia
13.
Histopathology ; 70(6): 929-937, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28000308

RESUMO

AIMS: Distinguishing premalignant sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) from hyperplastic polyps (HPs) is difficult for pathologists in daily practice. We aimed to evaluate nationwide variability within histopathology laboratories in the frequency of diagnosing an SSL as compared with an HP within the Dutch population-based screening programme for colorectal cancer and to assess the effect of an e-learning module on interlaboratory consistency. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were retrieved from the Dutch Pathology Registry from the start of the nationwide population screening programme, January 2014, until December 2015. An obligatory e-learning module was implemented among pathologists in October 2014. The ratio between SSL and HP diagnosis was determined per laboratory. Odds ratios (ORs) for the diagnosis of an SSL per laboratory were compared with the laboratory with the median odds (median laboratory), before and after implementation of the e-learning module. In total, 14 997 individuals with 27 879 serrated polyps were included; 6665 (23.9%) were diagnosed as SSLs, and 21 214 as HPs (76.1%). The ratio of diagnosing an SSL ranged from 5% to 47% (median 23%) within 44 laboratories. Half of the laboratories showed a significantly different OR (range 3.47-0.16) for diagnosing an SSL than the median laboratory. Variability decreased after implementation of the e-learning module (P = 0.02). Of all pathology laboratories, 70% became more consistent with the median laboratory after e-learning implementation. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated substantial interlaboratory variability in the histopathological diagnosis of SSLs, which significantly decreased after implementation of a structured e-learning module. Widespread implementation of education might contribute to more homogeneous practice among pathologists.


Assuntos
Pólipos do Colo/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Educação Médica/métodos , Patologia Clínica/educação , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Internet , Laboratórios/normas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
14.
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis ; 25(4): 431-440, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27981298

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Both chronic inflammation and reduced immunosurveillance contribute to malignancy development in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Previous literature suggests that especially Crohn's disease patients are at an increased risk for developing gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to identify risk factors for GC development in IBD and to compare the clinical characteristics of GC in IBD to those in the general population. METHODS: We retrospectively searched the Dutch Pathology Database to identify all Dutch IBD patients with GC between January 2004 and December 2008. Two case-control studies were performed. I: to identify risk factors for GC in IBD, with controls from the IBD South Limburg (IBDSL) population-based cohort; and II: to compare GC disease course in IBD patients with the general population. General population data were obtained from the Eindhoven Cancer Registry (ECR). RESULTS: We included 59 patients with IBD and GC (cases). Cases were significantly older at IBD diagnosis than IBDSL controls (median age 61 years versus 40; p<0.01), and ulcerative colitis (UC) was more frequent in the case group (69.5% versus 51.4%; p<0.01). We found no difference in age at diagnosis, gender, tumor location and tumor differentiation between IBD GC patients and ECR controls. When corrected for confounders and TNM-stage, IBD patients showed impaired survival (p=0.035; HR 1.385). CONCLUSIONS: Survival is significantly reduced in IBD patients compared to the general population in the multivariate analysis of our study, but age at GC diagnosis and TNM-stage were comparable between IBD cases and controls. Elderly onset IBD emerged as a risk factor for GC development in IBD patients, particularly in UC.


Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa/epidemiologia , Doença de Crohn/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idade de Início , Biópsia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Colite Ulcerativa/diagnóstico , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Colite Ulcerativa/mortalidade , Doença de Crohn/diagnóstico , Doença de Crohn/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Crohn/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo
15.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 25(8): 1224-30, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27257093

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The association between lichen sclerosus and vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) has long been recognized, but large epidemiologic studies are lacking. METHODS: Data of women diagnosed with vulvar pathology in the Netherlands were retrieved from the Dutch Pathology Registry. All vulvar pathology reports of this historical cohort were reviewed to construct a research database, including 3,038 women with lichen sclerosus diagnosed between 1991 and 2011. The incidence rate of lichen sclerosus and the cumulative incidence of VSCC among women with lichen sclerosus were estimated. RESULTS: Between 1991 and 2011, the incidence rate of lichen sclerosus increased from 7.4 to 14.6 per 100,000 woman-years. The median age at time of lichen sclerosus diagnosis was 59.8 years and the cumulative VSCC incidence was 6.7%. The 10-year VSCC incidence in women with lichen sclerosus was associated with concurrent vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN; 18.8% in women with VIN and 2.8% in women without VIN) and age at time of lichen sclerosus diagnosis (5.9% in women of ≥70 years, 3% in women between 50 and 70 years, and 1.8% in women <50 years). The effects of presence of VIN and age remained significant in adjusted Cox regression analysis. CONCLUSION: This historical cohort showed a nearly 100% increase in incidence of lichen sclerosus between 1991 and 2011. Concurrent VIN and age ≥70 years at time of lichen sclerosus diagnosis are important risk factors for vulvar cancer development. IMPACT: The incidence of lichen sclerosus is rising and special attention is needed in particular in women with concurrent VIN because of their high risk of cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(8); 1224-30. ©2016 AACR.


Assuntos
Carcinoma in Situ/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiologia , Líquen Escleroso e Atrófico/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Vulvares/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco
16.
Oncotarget ; 7(22): 31699-707, 2016 May 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27145371

RESUMO

Regional lymph node metastases in colorectal cancer (CRC) decrease outcome. Whether nodal metastases function as a biomarker, i.e. as a sign of advanced disease, or are in fact involved in the metastatic process is unclear. We evaluated metastatic patterns of CRC according to the lymph node status of the primary tumor.A retrospective review of 1393 patients with metastatic CRC who underwent autopsy in the Netherlands was performed. Metastatic patterns of regional lymph node positive and negative CRC were compared and validated by population-based data from the Eindhoven Cancer Registry (ECR).Patients with regional lymph node positive CRC more often developed peritoneal metastases (28% vs. 21%, p=0.003) and distant lymph node metastases (25% vs. 15%, p <0.001). Incidences of liver and lung metastases were comparable. Data from the ECR confirmed our findings regarding peritoneal (22.4% vs. 17.0%, p=0.003) and distant lymph node metastases (15.8% vs. 9.7%, p <0.001).Regional lymph node positive CRC show a slightly different dissemination pattern, with higher rates of peritoneal and distant lymph nodes metastases. Comparable incidences of liver and lung metastases support the hypothesis that dissemination to distant organs occurs independently of lymphatic spread.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundário , Linfonodos/patologia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/secundário , Idoso , Autopsia , Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/mortalidade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
17.
Virchows Arch ; 468(6): 639-49, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27097810

RESUMO

Pathology reporting is evolving from a traditional narrative report to a more structured synoptic report. Narrative reporting can cause misinterpretation due to lack of information and structure. In this systematic review, we evaluate the impact of synoptic reporting on completeness of pathology reports and quality of pathology evaluation for solid tumours. Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases were systematically searched to identify studies describing the effect of synoptic reporting implementation on completeness of reporting and quality of pathology evaluation of solid malignant tumours. Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies, except one, reported an increased overall completeness of pathology reports after introduction of synoptic reporting (SR). Most frequently studied cancers were breast (n = 9) and colorectal cancer (n = 16). For breast cancer, narrative reports adequately described 'tumour type' and 'nodal status'. Synoptic reporting resulted in improved description of 'resection margins', 'DCIS size', 'location' and 'presence of calcifications'. For colorectal cancer, narrative reports adequately reported 'tumour type', 'invasion depth', 'lymph node counts' and 'nodal status'. Synoptic reporting resulted in increased reporting of 'circumferential margin', 'resection margin', 'perineural invasion' and 'lymphovascular invasion'. In addition, increased numbers of reported lymph nodes were found in synoptic reports. Narrative reports of other cancer types described the traditional parameters adequately, whereas for 'resection margins' and '(lympho)vascular/perineural invasion', implementation of synoptic reporting was necessary. Synoptic reporting results in improved reporting of clinical relevant data. Demonstration of clinical impact of this improved method of pathology reporting is required for successful introduction and implementation in daily pathology practice.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Prontuários Médicos , Patologia Cirúrgica , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos
18.
Am J Surg Pathol ; 40(8): 1100-8, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26975039

RESUMO

Differentiation grade of colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) is a prognostic factor and important for therapy selection. In patients with stage II colon cancer, poor differentiation is an indication for adjuvant chemotherapy. The variability in daily practice in the grading of CRC was assessed in a nationwide cohort. Using the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA), all synoptically reported CRC resections from 2010 to 2013 were identified. Proportions of poorly differentiated (PD) adenocarcinomas were determined and compared between 35 laboratories by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. In total, 11,719 resections of 11,681 patients were included, of which 1427 (12.2%) were PD (range between 35 laboratories: 5.0% to 33.2%). After adjustment for case mix, 4 (11%) laboratories still reported a significantly lower (n=2) or higher (n=2) proportion of PD adenocarcinoma compared with the reference laboratory. Seven of 8 investigated laboratories showed considerable intralaboratory variation between pathologists as well. In a subgroup of 2812 patients (2813 tumors) who could have been eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy solely on the basis of the differentiation grade (stage II colon cancer patients without other high-risk factors [ie, T4, <10 lymph nodes evaluated, perforation, ileus, or angioinvasion]), 258 (9.2%) were PD (range between laboratories: 0% to 22.7%). In this subgroup, 4 laboratories still diagnosed significantly more PD adenocarcinomas after multivariable logistic regression analysis, increasing the number of colon cancer patients eligible for adjuvant therapy. In conclusion, this large nationwide cohort demonstrates considerable interlaboratory and intralaboratory variation in differentiation grading of CRC. Better standardization of grading criteria is needed for optimal determination of prognosis and treatment selection.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Gradação de Tumores/normas , Patologia Clínica/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários
19.
Head Neck ; 38 Suppl 1: E1247-55, 2016 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26315454

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine time trends for primary treatment modalities in advanced laryngeal cancer, overall survival (OS), and laryngectomy-free interval (LFI) over the last 2 decades in The Netherlands. METHODS: We conducted an analysis of T3 to T4 laryngeal cancer data from 2 combined national (population-based and pathology-based) cancer registries. RESULTS: A total of 2072 T3 cases (14.7%) and 1722 T4 cases (12.2%) were identified. Total laryngectomy as primary treatment modality decreased, whereas radiotherapy (RT) increased. For T3 disease, 5-year OS after primary total laryngectomy (+/- adjuvant RT), RT, and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) was 49%, 47%, and 45%, respectively. For T4 disease, this was 48%, 34%, and 42% (overall p < .0001), respectively. Five-year LFI for T3 disease was 81% (RT) and 77% (CRT), and for T4 disease it was 81% and 87%, respectively. CONCLUSION: From 1991 to 2010 total laryngectomy as primary treatment modality for advanced laryngeal cancer decreased and RT increased. T3 disease showed similar survival rates for all primary treatment modalities. For T4 disease, total laryngectomy (+ adjuvant RT) showed the best survival. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E1247-E1255, 2016.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Laríngeas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Laríngeas/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quimiorradioterapia , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Laringectomia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Resultado do Tratamento
20.
Histopathology ; 69(2): 187-97, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26707958

RESUMO

AIMS: Although high-grade dysplasia (HGD) is a risk factor for malignant transformation and the future development of adenomas/carcinomas, grade is not incorporated in the Dutch guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance, partly because of presumed interobserver variability. The aim of this study was to analyse, in a nationwide cohort of colorectal adenomas, the interlaboratory variability in the grading of dysplasia in daily practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: From the Dutch Pathology Registry, all synoptically reported classic adenomas in The Netherlands in 2013 were identified. The proportion of adenomas with HGD was determined for biopsies and polypectomies, and compared between 37 laboratories by the use of multivariable logistic regression analyses. In total, 21 030 colonoscopies of 20 270 patients were included. HGD was reported in 530 (3.6%) of 14 866 adenomas diagnosed on biopsies (range between laboratories: 0-13.6%) and in 983 (11.8%) of 8346 adenomas diagnosed on polypectomies (range: 3.1-42.9%). After adjustment for case mix, 13 (35%) laboratories reported a significantly lower or higher frequency of HGD than average. CONCLUSIONS: We observed considerable interlaboratory variation in the grading of dysplasia in colorectal adenomas, which could be only partly explained by differences in case mix. Therefore, better standardization of grading criteria is needed before grade of dysplasia can usefully be incorporated in colonoscopy surveillance guidelines.


Assuntos
Adenoma/classificação , Carcinoma/classificação , Pólipos do Colo/classificação , Neoplasias Colorretais/classificação , Idoso , Biópsia , Estudos de Coortes , Colonoscopia , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperplasia/classificação , Masculino , Países Baixos , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...